PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, ATUL S. CHANDURKAR
Meenakshi Natarajan – Appellant
Versus
Election Commission Of India – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioner would call in question the order passed by the Returning Officer on 09.06.2026, rejecting her nomination for a Rajya Sabha seat in the biennial election for the Rajya Sabha seats of the State of Madhya Pradesh.
2. The petitioner being a candidate belonging to Indian National Congress submitted her nomination; however, the same has been rejected by the impugned order on the ground that the nomination paper filed by the petitioner Smt. Meenakshi Natarajan as a candidate in the Madhya Pradesh Rajya Sabha election, in the Form-26 Affidavit, she did not disclose the pendency of a criminal case against her, thereby suppressing material information by filing an incomplete affidavit. It is also mentioned that the Court has taken cognizance of the criminal complaint filed against the petitioner and summons have also been issued to her to appear before the Court and that the petitioner has also filed her statement before the said Magisterial Court, therefore, she has full knowledge about pendency of the case.
3. According to the petitioner, after the impugned order was passed by the Returning Officer, the petitioner approached the Election Commission of India; however,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.