SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 1070

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI
B. KRISHNA MOHAN, J.
Hanumantha Rao Desaisetty, S/o. Ganapathi Rao Desaisetty – Petitioner
Versus
The Election Commission of India, Rep. by its Chief Election Officer and Others - Respondents
Writ Petition No.10137 Of 2024
Decided On : 29-04-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Aishwarya Nagula
For the Respondents: D.S. Siva Darshan, GP for General Administration, D. Srinivas, Senior Counsel.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court affirmed that challenges to election nominations must be made post-election through an election petition, as per Article 329(b) of the Constitution.

Headnote:

(A) Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 33A, 80, and 100 - Writ Petition questioning the acceptance of nomination papers - The court held that the Returning Officer's duty to scrutinize nominations is essential and any objections must be raised through an election petition post-election, as per Article 329(b) of the Constitution. (Paras 11, 12, 23)

(B) Jurisdiction - The court emphasized that the jurisdiction under Article 226 cannot be invoked during ongoing election processes, and any challenge to nomination must be made after the election through appropriate legal channels. (Paras 11, 12, 23)

Facts of the case:

The petitioner challenged the acceptance of the 7th respondent's nomination for the 2024 Legislative Assembly Elections, alleging non-disclosure of a second wife and her properties.

Findings of Court:

The court found that the Returning Officer acted within his jurisdiction and the objections raised were not sustainable at this stage.

Issues: The main issue was whether the acceptance of the nomination could be questioned at this stage or only through an election petition.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that challenges to election processes must be made post-election, affirming the constitutional bar against pre-election judicial intervention.

Result: Writ Petition dismissed.

ORDER :

(B. Krishna Mohan, J.)

Heard the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, the learned Senior Counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 6 and the learned Senior Counsel for the respondent No.7.

2. This Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent No.6 n not rejecting the nomination of the 7th respondent to the 117-Nellore City Assembly Constituency in the ensuing 2024 Legislative Assembly Elections, for not furnishing the details of his second wife Smt. Ponguru Indira and her properties in Form-26 filed along with his nomination on the ground of suppression and misrepresentation of the material facts, pursuant to the Objection Petition filed by the petitioner dated 26.04.2024 along with the supporting documents and overruling the objections raised by the petitioner vide order dated 26.04.2024 in Rc.A.54/2024/RO.

3. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the 7th respondent submitted Form-26 affidavit to be filed by the candidate along with the nomination paper before the Returning Officer for Election to Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly 2024 from 117-Nellore City Assembly Constituency. In the column of the “name of the spouse” he only mentioned the first wife’s name Smt. Ponguru Ramadevi with PAN.No.ACSPP8838K, but he did not mention about his second wife and her assets in the list of particulars to be furnished in the said Form-26. In the lease deed dated 28.06.2008 it was clearly mentioned about the other wife of the 7th respondent as Ponguru Indira husband of Ponguru Narayana. The sale deed dated 30.10.2000 also stands in her name. The rectification deed dated 13.10.2022 also stands in her name. Thus some of the properties are also standing in her name who is said to be the second wife of the 7th respondent.

4. The Section 33-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 reads as under:-

    33A. Right to information:-

    (1) A candidate shall, apart from any information which he is required to furnish, under this Act or the rules made there under, in his nomination paper delivered under sub-section (1) of section 33, also furnish the information as to whether:-

    (i) He is accused of any offence punishable with imprisonment for two years or more in a pending case in which a charge has been framed by the court of competent jurisdiction;

    (ii) He has been convicted of an offence [other than any offence referred to in sub-section (1) or sub-section (2), or covered in sub-section (3), of section 8] and sentenced to imprisonment for one year or more.

    (2) The candidate or his proposer, as the case may be, shall, at the time of delivering to the returning officer the nomination paper under sub-section (1) of section 33, also deliver to him an affidavit sworn by the candidate in a prescribed form verifying the information specified in subsection (1).

    (3) The returning officer shall, as soon as may be after the furnishing of information to him under sub-section (1), display the aforesaid information by affixing a copy of the affidavit, delivered under sub-section (2), at a conspicuous place at his office for the information of the electors relating to a constituency for which the nomination paper is delivered.

5. The candidate shall deliver an affidavit sworn by him in a prescribed form verifying the information furnished in sub-section (1) of the said Section.

6. The Section 80 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 deals with the Election Petition which reads as under:-

    80. Election petitions. No election shall be called in question except by an election petition presented in accordance with the provisions of this part.

7. The Section 100 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 reads as under:-

    100. Grounds for declaring election to be void.-[(1) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2) if the High Court is of opinion-

    (a) that on the date of his election a returned candidate was not qualified, or was disqualified, to be chosen to fill the seat under the Constitution or this Act[][

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top