SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 55

RAMESH RANGANATHAN
M. D. Soujanya – Appellant
Versus
S. V. V. P. V. M. C. Manila Vidya Peeth, Visakhapatnam – Respondent


( 1 ) IN this writ petition, the petitioners question the action of respondents 2 and 3 in not admitting the posts, held by them, to grant-in-aid in terms of the provisions of the A. P. Private Educational Institutions grant-in-aid (Regulations) Act, 1988 and seek consequential directions to the respondents to admit the said posts to grant- in-aid and for a further direction to the 1st respondent to pay their salary, as per the scales applicable to aided Lecturers, with effect from 21. 7. 1993, the date of their regular appointment, till such time the posts are admitted to grant-in-aid.

( 2 ) FACTS, to the extent necessary for this writ petition, are that the 1 st petitioner, an M. Sc. in Zoology from Andhra University, and the 2nd petitioner, an M. Sc. m Physics and an M. Phil, possessed the qualifications and were eligible to be appointed as Lecturers in degree colleges. The 1st respondent, an aided private college, established by Sri venkateswara Vidya Peeth, was granted conditional permission to start a degree college by the 3rd respondent in G. O. Ms. No. 550 dated 22. 7. 1980. Among the several conditions, prescribed was that appointment of staff was to be made as per the sta
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top