SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 295

V.V.S.RAO
Meda Anjamma – Appellant
Versus
Vikram China Veeraiah – Respondent


( 1 ) THE petitioners are the plaintiffs aggrieved by order, dated 25-7-2003, in o. S. No. 27 of 1995, they filed the present civil revision petitioner under Article 227 of constitution of India.

( 2 ) THE first petitioner is the wife of second petitioner, and is daughter of the first respondent. The petitioners filed the suit being O. S. No. 27 of 1995 on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, addanki for declaration of title and for injunction in respect of items 1 to 3 of suit schedule property. Item 1 is the land to an extent of Acs. 0. 80 and items 2 and 3 are the lands to an extent of Acs. 0. 60 each. These agricultural lands are identified by patta No. 26 in survey No. 359 admeasuring acs. 5. 59 (total extent ). At the time of the trial, the plaintiffs sought to mark an agreement of sale, dated 4-4-1979, executed in their favour by respondents 1 to 3 (defendants 1 to 3) An objection was raised by the Counsel for defendants 4 to 10/ respondents 4 o 10 herein on two grounds, namely, the document offered as evidence is a sale deed and as it is improperly stamped the same cannot be admitted in evidence, and secondly, being a sale deed, in the absence of regis









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top