V.V.S.RAO
Meda Anjamma – Appellant
Versus
Vikram China Veeraiah – Respondent
( 2 ) THE first petitioner is the wife of second petitioner, and is daughter of the first respondent. The petitioners filed the suit being O. S. No. 27 of 1995 on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, addanki for declaration of title and for injunction in respect of items 1 to 3 of suit schedule property. Item 1 is the land to an extent of Acs. 0. 80 and items 2 and 3 are the lands to an extent of Acs. 0. 60 each. These agricultural lands are identified by patta No. 26 in survey No. 359 admeasuring acs. 5. 59 (total extent ). At the time of the trial, the plaintiffs sought to mark an agreement of sale, dated 4-4-1979, executed in their favour by respondents 1 to 3 (defendants 1 to 3) An objection was raised by the Counsel for defendants 4 to 10/ respondents 4 o 10 herein on two grounds, namely, the document offered as evidence is a sale deed and as it is improperly stamped the same cannot be admitted in evidence, and secondly, being a sale deed, in the absence of regis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.