SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 230

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Sangu Brahmam – Appellant
Versus
Station House Officer, Garidepalli P. S. , Nalgonda District – Respondent


L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition is filed for a declaration that the inaction of the first respondent in not according necessary help to the petitioners, to protect their possession over an extent of Ac. 12-32 cents of land in various survey numbers of kasavarigudem Village, H/o. Kalvapalli village, Garidepalli Mandal of Nalgonda district, is illegal, arbitrary and violative of articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India. A consequential direction is sought to the first respondent for extension of necessary help to the petitioners.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the relevant facts are that the petitioners, or their predecessors in title as the case may be, were granted patta certificates, in respect of the land referred to above, by the Settlement Officer under the provisions of the Estates Abolition act, 1948, through order dated 23-3-1967. When the Respondents 2 to 5 tried to interfere with their possession, suits in OS nos. 45 and 46 of 1987 were filed in the court of Senior Civil Judge, Suryapet, for the relief of perpetual injunction. Respondents 2 to 5 in turn filed OS. No. 44 of 1987, for similar relief, in respect of the same land. Through a common judgment












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top