SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 281

G.BIKSHAPATHY, P.S.NARAYANA, GOPALA KRISHNAN NAIR
P. CHANDRA MOULI – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. , DEPT. OF HOME – Respondent


P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) WHEN the matter came up for admission and hearing at the request of the Counsel on record, the matter is taken up for final hearing where the Counsel made elaborate submissions and in view of the same, the writ Petition is being disposed of finally at the stage of admission.

( 2 ) SRI P. Chandramouli, Assistant commissioner of Police (now under suspension), filed the present Writ Petition questioning the order made in O. A. No. 589/ 05 dated 24-2-2005 on the file of A. P. Administrative Tribunal, in short referred to as tribunal" for the purpose of convenience. The order impugned in the Writ Petition is as hereunder"in this O. A. the applicant is challenging the suspension order. As per Rule 33 of APCS (CCA) Rules, the applicant has a right of appeal. Therefore, this OA is disposed of, with a direction to the applicant to prefer an appeal before the appellate authority within two weeks from to-day and on such appeal being filed, the respondents shall dispose of the same within six weeks thereafter. "in the aforesaid O. A. the writ petitioner/applicant questioned the proceedings c. No. 36/02/2004 dated 1-2-2005 made by the 2nd respondent suspending the peti

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top