P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) ONE Sri Atluri Pursushotham, the Writ petitioner in W. P. No. 15716 of 2004 had set the law into motion by questioning G. O. Ms. No. 33 M. A. , Municipal Administration and urban Development (M2) Department, dated 3-2-2001 and also sanctioned plan issued by respondent No. 1. The 1st respondent is vijayawada-Guntur-Tenali-Mangalagiri urban Development Authority, and the 2nd respondent is Vijayawada Municipal corporation. Respondents No. 3 to 5 are the parties who obtained the sanctioned plan. Respondent No. 6 is Government of Andhra pradesh, represented by Secretary Municipal administration.

( 2 ) THE writ petitioner had prayed for a relief of Writ of Mandamus declaring the g. O. Ms. No. 33 MA, Municipal Administration and Urban Development (M2) Department, dated 3-2-2001, as illegal and contrary to the provisions of the A. P. Urban Areas (Development) Act, 1975 and the Hyderabad municipal Corporations Act, 1955, A. P. Fire services Act, 1999 and A. P. Apartments Act, 1987 and the rules made thereunder and further declare that the plan sanctioned by the 1st Respondent Vide File NO. RC C2/ 906/04 and permit bearing B. P. No. 121/4/ vja, dated 29-7-2004 as ill

Click Here to Read the rest of this document