SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(AP) 298

S.PARVATHA RAO
Sarada Bai – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Shakuntala Bai – Respondent


S. PARVATHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision Petition is filed under Art. 227 of the Constitution of India for declaring the order dated 6-12-1989 made in E. P. No. 3 of 1988 in O. S. No. 1932 of 1985 and the consequential order dated 7-3-1990 made in E. A. No. 23 of 1990 in E. P. No. 3 of 1988 by the IInd Assistant Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad regularising the unauthorised constructions in respect of the premises bearing Municipal No. 21-2-142/1 to 4 situated at Charkaman in Hyderabad city, as illegal and unjust and for setting aside the said orders, etc.

( 2 ) THE affidavit in support of this Civil Revision Petition is filed by the 1st petitioner. She states that she is the absolute owner of the premises bearing Municipal No. 21-2-131/7 to 9 situated at Charkaman in Hyderabad and that the said premises are siutated opposite to the premises bearing Municipal No. 21-2-142/1 to 4 on the other side of the road. The 2nd petitioner is the husband of the 1st petitioner and the 3rd petitioner is a tenant of the premises bearing Municipal No. 21-2-131/7 to 9 of the 1st petitioner. The 1st petitioner states that the premises bearing Municipal No. 21-2-142/1 to 4 were purchased by t


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top