C. Y. SOMAYAJULU, J.

( 1 ) SINCE these writ petitions are interconnected they are being disposed of by a common order. For the sake of convenience parties would hereinafter be referred to as they are arrayed in W. P. No. 19020 of 2004.

( 2 ) OWNER of the premises bearing h. No. 5-7-523/24-land2 at Nampally Dargah initially filed W. P. No. 19020 of 2004 questioning the proceedings No. 56/86 dated 4-10-2004 of the Commissioner, Municipal corporation of Hyderabad (first respondent), issued under Section 636 of the Hyderabad municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (the Act), to remove the constructions made by her, and later amended the prayer as one to set aside the proceedings dated 1/2-7-2004 of the first respondent in Lr. No. F/o/97/tpsho/ 2004-2362. Petitioner in W. P. No. 2673 of 2005 got himself impleaded as 2nd respondent in that writ petition subsequently.

( 3 ) THE case of the petitioner is that she, after complying with the necessary formalities, applied for construction of a commercial complex in her premises bearing H. No. 5-7-523/24-1and2 and was accorded permission by the first respondent vide permit No. 158/15740 dated 20-7-1998 for construction of ground, 1st and 2nd floors and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document