Sadhu Varahala Babu – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. ,co-operation department – Respondent
( 2 ) THE respondents contended that the orders of termination have been passed by following the provisions of the Act and the instructions given by the concerned authorities from time to time. Therefore, there is no illegality or arbitrariness in the orders of termination passed against the petitioners.
( 3 ) SINCE these matters involved similar questions of fact and law, I wish to answer a common question of law regarding the maintainability of the writ petitions initially and the merits of the writ petitions separately.
( 4 ) IN the light of the contentions made by both parties, the following are the points taken up for consideration. Points for consideration: (1) Whether a writ of mandamus agains
Ryot of Garabandho v. Raja of Parlakimidi
R.Lakshmi v. Neyveli Lignite Corporation
S.Radhika Sameena v. S.H.O. Habeebnagar P.S. Hyderabad
G. Misra v. Orissa Association of Sanskrit Language and Culture
Ch.Ankamma Vs Registrar of Co operative Societies, Hyderabad
SUM.Prasad Vs Andhra Pradesh State Federation of Co operative Spinning Mills Ltd.
A.P.State Co operative Societies Secretaries and Employees Union Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh
Pinapatruni Nagabhushanam Vs Government of Andhara Pradesh, Co operation Department
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.