SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 549

P.S.NARAYANA
Pandugula Vall Basha – Appellant
Versus
N. Mohd. Haris – Respondent


( 1 ) THE defendant in o. S. No. 1 /91 on the file of the District Judge, kurnool, aggrieved by the Judgment and decree, dated 30-1-1995, preferred the present appeal. The respondents herein are the plaintiffs in the said suit. The suit was instituted under Sections 105 and 106 of the trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 praying for the relief of permanent injunction restraining the appellant herein-the defendant, his men, agents from using the offending trade mark photo Hussain Basha beedilu or using similar trade mark of the plaintiffs or making use of such labels or passing off the goods-Beedies of the defendant with such mark and also further prayed for an order to deliver up all the infringing labels and marks available with the defendant to the plaintiff for destruction and also further prayed for awarding of damages of Rs. 1,000/- for passing off the goods and for such other suitable reliefs. The learned judge on appreciation of the evidence of p. Ws. 1 and 2 and D. Ws. 1 to 3, Exs. A-1 to a-17 and Exs. B-1 to B-11, decreed the suit granting permanent injunction restraining the defendant and his men for using the offending trade Mark or similar Trade Mark with the design,

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top