SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 627

V.V.S.RAO
GVPREL-MEE (J. V), General power of Attorney Holder, Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. , Irrigation and Command Area Development department – Respondent


( 1 ) INTRODUCTION: the Government of Andhra Pradesh mooted water resource development projects for medium size projects in the State with a view to complete all the important projects in progress and also proposed to take up new projects. All these are to be completed within a period of five years to augment irrigation potential. The Government proposed to divide works into suitably large convenient packages so as to invite tenders for Engineering, procurement and Construction (EPC)on turn key system including investigation, design, preparation of construction of projects, cost estimates, construction, maintenance and operation for one irrigation system. The government decided to take up the tender process in two stages. In the first stage it proposed to empanel a specified number of special class civil contractors by inviting offers for pre-qualification to tender for the projects. In the second stage it was proposed to again invite tenders inviting offers from empanelled concerns/firms/companies to take up water resources projects on EPC turn key basis. These financial bids are to be evaluated mainly at the stage of a high powered committee and then by the Government. The disput






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top