SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 618

D.S.R.VERMA, G.ROHINI
P. Malleswaramma – Appellant
Versus
P. Prathap Reddy – Respondent


D. S. R. VARMA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the order passed in O. P. No. 6717 of 1991 on the file of the Subordinate Judge s Court, Kurnool, which was filed under Section 13 of Hindu marriage Act, 1955, seeking a decree of divorce. The trial Court on 30. 6. 1992 allowed the said O. P. , and thereby dissolved the marriage of the petitioner/husband with the respondent//wife by granting a decree of divorce. Aggrieved by the same, appellant/ wife preferred this appeal.

( 2 ) FOR the sake of convenience, parties to this appeal are referred to as they were arrayed before the trial Court in the Original petition.

( 3 ) THE facts, which are not in dispute, are that the couple got married in the year 1981 and they lived together for about nine years. Afterwards it seems there arose differences, as a result, wife and husband started living separately.

( 4 ) BE that as it may, husband filed o. P. No. 6717 of 1991 seeking decree of divorce on the ground that he was being denied right of conjugal society by his wife. It is his allegation that his wife was suffering from some sort of disorder and she is aggressive in nature. Therefore, it is alleged that such denial of conjugal soc


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top