SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 5

D.S.R.VERMA, G.ROHINI
Indian Iron and Steel Co. Limited, Kolkata – Appellant
Versus
Tlwari Road Lines – Respondent


D. S. R. VARMA, J.

( 1 ) HEARD both sides.

( 2 ) THE order, dated 27-12-2004, passed by the Chief Judge, City Civil Courts, hyderabad, allowing the petition O. P. No. 2217 of 2003 and appointing a retired judicial Officer as sole arbitrator to decide the dispute between the parties, is under challenge in the present Writ Petition.

( 3 ) OP. No. 2217 of 2003 was filed under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation act, 1996 (for brevity "the Act") for appointment of Arbitrator for adjudicating the dispute between the parties.

( 4 ) THE petitioner herein is the respondent and the respondent herein is the petitioner before the Court below in O. P. No. 2217 of 2003.

( 5 ) THE facts, which are not in dispute, are that the respondent is a transporter doing transportation business. The petitioner is a public limited company. Both the parties have their Head Offices at Kolkata. They have their branch offices at Hyderabad also. The respondent has to transport the material to different parts of the country as required by the petitioner.

( 6 ) BE that as it may, for some reasons, the details of which are not worth mentioning, the petitioner had invoked the Bank Guarantee for a sum of Rs

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top