SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 1058

V.V.S.RAO
Nandhini Delux, Bangalore – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS writ petition is filed praying for a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the first respondent in disqualifying the petitioner in the technical bid for leasing out restaurant, canteen and pantry at A. P. Bhavan, New Delhi, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the constitution of India. At the stage of admission itself, the first respondent, namely, government of Andhra Pradesh, and second respondent (who was impleaded later) filed counter-affidavits. The learned Counsel appearing for rival parties made detailed submissions and therefore with their consent the matter is being disposed of by this order. The petitioner also seeks a consequential direction to the first respondent to accept the technical bid of the petitioner and consider price bid. Alternatively, it is also prayed to cancel the tender process pursuant to tender notice dated 3. 8. 2005.

( 2 ) THE case of the petitioner as disclosed in the writ affidavit, in brief, is as follows. The first respondent issued tender notice dated 3. 8. 2005 inviting tenders from reputed catering contractors for running restaurant/canteen and pantry for the inmates of Guest House and visitors of A. P. Bhavan. T


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top