SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 920

G.YETHIRAJULU
Pothyamsetti Satyanarayana Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS is a revision case filed by the accused in the S. C. No. 164 of 1992 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge, ramachandrapuram, challenging the convictions and sentences imposed by the said court and confirmed by the Sessions Court, rajahmundry in Criminal Appeal No. 230 of 1992.

( 2 ) THE revision petitioners are A-1 to a-3 in Crime No. 28 of 1991 of Rajavaram p. S. registered for the offences under sections 306 and 509, IPC.

( 3 ) THIS revision petition was allowed in part by this Court through the order dated 22-11 -1996 acquitting the petitioners for the offence under Section 306, IPC and confirming their conviction for the offence under section 509, IPC and reducing the sentence of imprisonment to the period already undergone. The de facto complainant who is the first respondent herein preferred Criminal Appeal No. 1056 of 1997 before the supreme Court of India and the Supreme Court through its judgment dated 17-3-2004 set aside the order of this Court and remitted the matter back to hear the case afresh and dispose of the same according to law. The hon ble Supreme Court observed that there was no consideration whatsoever in the judgment of the High Court of the

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top