G.YETHIRAJULU
Pothyamsetti Satyanarayana Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent
( 2 ) THE revision petitioners are A-1 to a-3 in Crime No. 28 of 1991 of Rajavaram p. S. registered for the offences under sections 306 and 509, IPC.
( 3 ) THIS revision petition was allowed in part by this Court through the order dated 22-11 -1996 acquitting the petitioners for the offence under Section 306, IPC and confirming their conviction for the offence under section 509, IPC and reducing the sentence of imprisonment to the period already undergone. The de facto complainant who is the first respondent herein preferred Criminal Appeal No. 1056 of 1997 before the supreme Court of India and the Supreme Court through its judgment dated 17-3-2004 set aside the order of this Court and remitted the matter back to hear the case afresh and dispose of the same according to law. The hon ble Supreme Court observed that there was no consideration whatsoever in the judgment of the High Court of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.