SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 1019

C.Y.SOMAYAJULU
Duvvuru Siva Kumar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Malli Srinivasulu – Respondent


( 1 ) THOUGH these two revisions arise from two different proceedings pending before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribfunalcum-1st additional District Judge, Nellore, since both the cases arise out of the same accident, they are being disposed of by a common order.

( 2 ) C. R. P. NO. 961 of 2005 arises out of the order dated 10. 01. 2005 in I. A. No. 1702 of 2004 in O. P. No. 531 of 2004 directing the respondent therein, who is the revision petitioner in c. R. P. No. 961 of 2005, to furnish security for an amount of rs. 3,50,000/- on or before 17-01-2005 and directing attachment be for judgment of the property specified in the schedule mentioned in the petition in case of his default.

( 3 ) C. R. P. NO. 4861 of 2005 is filed by the claimants in O. P. No. 16 of 2005 being aggrieved by the order in I. A. No. 72 of 2005 dismissing the petition seeking attachment before Judgment of t he properties belonging to the first respondent therein, who is the revision petitioner in C. R. P. No. 961 of 2005.

( 4 ) FOR the sake of convenience, I would hereinafter refer the claimants in the O. Ps as claimants, and the revision petitioner in c. R. P. No. 961 of 2005, who is the first respondent in c.















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top