SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 1090

C.V.RAMULU
Nalam Bharathi – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Hyderabad – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS Second Appeal is filed being aggrieved by a Judgment and decree daied 6-11-2000 made in A. S. No, 73 of 1999 on the file of the learned District judge, East Godavari, Rajahmundry, wherein the Judgment and Decree dated 8-9-1997 made in O. S. No. 46 of 1991 on the file of the learned I Additional District munsif, Rajahmundry, decreeing the suit, has been partly reversed.

( 2 ) THE appellant is the plaintiff. Respondents are the defendants. The parties are hereinafter referred to as they are arrayed in the suit.

( 3 ) IT is the case of the plaintiff that she passed SSLC Examination from Town High school, Rajahmundry in March, 1964. Thereafter, she studied PUC, B. Sc. , and M. Sc. After completion of her studies, she joined as Lecturer in the 4th defendant s college in the year 1983. Her date of birth was mistakenly reported by her parents as 10-3-1948, The said incorrect date of birth was mentioned in the SSLC register. In October, 1989 she came to know that her date of birth was wrongly mentioned as 10-3-1948 instead of 24-4-1949. She was born at Rajahmundry and her date of birth was entered in the Municipal records as 24-4-1949. As her date of birth was incorrectly record











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top