SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(SC) 503

O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, R.S.PATHAK
Brij Behari Lal Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
High Court Of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.VERMA, K.J.JOHN, K.K.VENUGOPAL, M.S.Gupta, MANISHA GUPTA, R.K.GARG, S.K.Gambhir

Judgment

PATHAK. J.:- This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh upholding an order compulsorily retiring the appellant from the post of District and Sessions Judge.

2. The appellant, a member of the judicial service of Madhya Pradesh, was promoted to the post of District and Sessions Judge in April, 1969. On 6th October, 1977 an order was made appointing him to a Selection Grade post. He was thereafter appointed temporarily as Presiding Judge, State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Madhya Pradesh, Gwalior. On 28th September, 1979 the State Government made an order under Fundamental Rule 56 (3) of the M. P. Shashkiya Sewak (Adhiwarshikya Ayu) Sanshodhan Adhiniyam, 1976 purporting to retire the appellant in the public interest.

3. The appellant filed a writ petition in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh against the retirement order, but the writ petition was dismissed by the High Court on 12th October, 1979. Before the High Court the appellant did not dispute that there was power to compulsorily retire him under Fundamental Rule 56 (3) but he contended that there was no material before the High Court to lead to the conclusion that his r












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top