SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 1121

B.PRAKASH RAO, G.YETHIRAJULU
Chapala Chinnabbayi – Appellant
Versus
Naralaaetti Anusuyaina – Respondent


G. YETHIRAJULU J.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference made by a learned single Judge of this Court to answer the following questions by a Division Bench :1) Whether additional documents throwing light by way of subsequent events can be brought on record in a Second Appeal, and if so what is the scope and ambit and the applicability of Order 41, Rule 27 r/w. Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure in such a case?2) Whether the view expressed by the Division Bench of this Court in Anisetti bhagyavathi v. Andaluri Satyanarayana and others, AIR 1992 Andh Pra 304 : 1992 (1) alt 455 can be extended to cases of bringing subsequent events to the notice of the high Court in Second Appeals?"

( 2 ) AN application covered by C. M. P. No. 24429 of 2002 in S. A. No. 500 of 1995 was filed under O. 41, R. 27 read with S. 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure to receive additional documents which throw light on subsequent events in a second appeal. The learned single Judge entertained a doubt whether a Judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in Anisetti Bhagyavathi s case (supra) can be applied to cases of bringing subsequent events to the notice of the Court in a second appeal. Since the learned Judge fel

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top