SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 50

P.S.NARAYANA
K. C. Balasubramanyam Pillai – Appellant
Versus
Bodireddygari Ramakrishna Reddy – Respondent


P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) BODIREDDYGARI Ramakrishna Reddy, respondent in this C. R. P. moved an application in C. M. P. No. 27893 of 2003 to vacate the stay granted in C. M. P. No. 20989 of 2003 in C. R. P. No. 4625 of 2003, dated 14-11-2003. At the stage of hearing of the vacate application, Sri C. M. R. Velu, learned counsel representing the vacate petitioner-respondent in the C. R. P. and Sri Krishnan, learned counsel representing sri K. S. Gopalakrishnan, learned counsel for the revision petitioner had made a request to dispose of the main C. R. P. itself, and that is how, with the consent of the parties the main c. R. P. is being disposed of.

( 2 ) K. C. Balasubramanyam Pillai, the revision petitioner, is the petitioner in E. A. No. 67 of 2003 and judgment-debtor in o. E. P. No. 20 of 2002 and defendant in o. S. No. 46 of 1992, on the file of Senior civil Judge, Puttur. The said k. C. Balasubramanyam Pillai, moved the aforesaid application in E. A. No. 67 of 2003 under Section 28 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (for short the Act ), for rescission of contract of sale, dated 22-02-1991, and the learned Senior Civil Judge, Puttur, after recording reasons had arrived at a conclus










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top