( 1 ) AGGRIEVED by an order in la. No. 220 of 2003 in O. S. No. 251 of 2000 dated 31. 3. 2003 on the file of the principal Junior Civil Judge, Peddapuram the unsuccessful petitioner-plaintiff filed this present revision under Article 227 of the constitution of India. From the order it appears that the above mentioned LA. was filed invoking the jurisdiction of the Court under Order 7, Rule 14 (3) of CPC. Under the above mentioned IA, the petitioner wanted to tender two documents in evidence at the time of the trial of the above mentioned suit. One of the documents is an alleged notice dated 17. 10. 2003 issued by an Advocate on behalf of the defendants in the suit and the second document is the typed copy of an alleged partition deed said to have been supplied to the petitioner by the defendants in O. S. No. 130 of 1966 on the file of the Sub-Court, Kakinada.

( 2 ) BY the impugned order, the above mentioned IA was allowed and in the language of the Trial Court as follows : "petition is allowed on condition that the petitioner shall pay for costs of Rs. 100. 00 and copy of legal notice to be received in the evidence and typed copy of partition deed cannot be receive