SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 250

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, GHULAM MOHAMMED
Sunder – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Ismail – Respondent


B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order dated 8-9-2003 made in e. A. No. 365 of 2003 in E. P. No. 60 of 2003 on the file of the learned XI Junior Civil judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad.

( 2 ) THE petitioner in the said E. A. is the petitioner in this civil revision petition. The learned trial Judge rejected the application filed by the petitioner herein under order XVI, Rule 6 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure to summon the document viz. , the letter of consent dated 10-6-1999 from M/s. Modern garments, Bangalore. The said letter is purported to have been given by the 1st respondent-decree holder to M/s. Modern garments, Bangalore. The learned trial judge after a very elaborate consideration of the matter came to the conclusion that the very existence of the consent letter dated 10-6-1999 itself is doubtful. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned judge came to the conclusion that the said consent letter alleged to have been given by the 1st respondent-decree holder in favour of M/s. Modern Garments, bangalore, i


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top