SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 295

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Amangenti Prameela – Appellant
Versus
P. Venkat Reddy (Died) per lrs. – Respondent


L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONERS filed O. S. No. 8 of 1998 in the court of Senior Civil Judge, Nalgonda for the relief of partition and separate possession. The trial of the suit was commenced. Petitioners closed their evidence and the evidence of defendants commenced. The first defendant examined himself as D. W. 1. During the course of his cross-examination, it was elicited through him that a partition took place among various members of the family on 12-1-1980 and two sets of documents were executed evidencing the said partition. It was also elicited from him that one of the documents was kept with him and the other with one Mr. Pratap Reddy. He has not filed the document dated 12-1-1980.

( 2 ) PETITIONERS got issued a notice to d. W. 1 calling upon him to produce the original of the document, dated 12-1-1980, before the Court. There was no response to this. Thereupon, the petitioners secured xerox copy of the document, dt. 12-1-1980, which is said to be a partition deed. They filed I. A. No. 156 of 2001 in the Court seeking permission to adduce it as secondary evidence. They also claim to have filed i. A. No. 205 of 2001 for impounding the said document, since it was not











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top