( 1 ) HEARD Sri Taddi Nageswara Rao, the counsel representing the revision petitioner. None represents the respondents though notices had been served on the respondents.

( 2 ) ON 3-1 -2003, this Court while admitting the Civil Revision Petition initially granted interim stay for a period of four weeks and subsequent thereto on 9-1-2003, interim stay already granted was extended till further orders. The 1st petitioner-1st judgment debtor in E. A. No. 539 of 2002 in E. P. No. 102 of 2000 in O. S. No. 168 of 1983 on the file of principal Junior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram is the present revision petitioner.

( 3 ) THE application in E. A. No. 539 of 2002 was moved by the revision petitioner herein and another Thripuragiri Kannayya who is shown as respondent No. 3 but specified as not a necessary party in the present Civil revision Petition. The respondents 1 and 2 herein obtained a decree for declaration and for perpetual injunction in O. S. No. 168 of 1983 on the file of Principal Junior Civil judge, Vizianagaram, in relation to the plaint schedule property. The judgment debtors as petitioners in E. A. No. 539 of 2002 raised objection that there is no neem tree at all