S. R. K. PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) THE tenant has preferred this revision petition against the order of eviction passed by the Additional Chief Judge, City Small causes court, Hyderabad in R. A. No. 149 of 1998. The jural relationship between the landlord and tenant is not in dispute. The landlord has contended that there was wilful default in payment of rents regarding the premises durina Auaust 1995 to November 1995 and the shop was required for his bona fide requirement to run business by his sons. The same is opposed by the tenant alleging that he has tendered the rents by way of demand draft as well as money order and he has not committed any default. The tenant has also resisted eviction that there was no bona fide requirement for the landlord to seek eviction. The IV Additional Rent controller gave a finding that there was wilful default in payment of rents and there was no bona fide requirement for the landlord to claim the premises for his personal use and ordered eviction in R. C. No. 787 of 1995. Thereupon, the tenant preferred an appeal in r. A. No. 149 of 1998. The learned Additional chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, hyderabad, confirmed the finding of the trial court and di

Click Here to Read the rest of this document