SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 958

D.S.R.VERMA
Yale Malleshappa – Appellant
Versus
Chinna Hotur Bale Eramma – Respondent


D. S. R. VARMA, J.

( 1 ) HEAD both sides.

( 2 ) THIS civil revision petition is directed against the order and decree, dated 12-7-2004, passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge at Adoni, Kurnool District, allowing the application in LA. No. 673 of 2004 in O. S. No. 282 of 2004, filed under Rule 129 of the Civil Rules of Practice and Order 16, rules 1 and 2 and Section 151 of the code of Civil Procedure to summon the mandal Revenue Officer by directing him to produce the original Adangal for the faslis 1404 to 1413 pertaining to the suit schedule land bearing S. No. 447 of Madire village.

( 3 ) THE petitioners are the defendants and the respondent is the plaintiff.

( 4 ) FOR the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as arrayed in the suit.

( 5 ) THE short question that falls for consideration in this Civil Revision Petition is - as to whether a party to the suit can make an application under Order 16, Rule 1 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil procedure seeking to summon a person directing him to produce some records pertaining to the suit schedule property, without there being any issues framed by the Court?

( 6 ) THE undisputed facts are that the plaintiff fi

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top