SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 998

P.S.NARAYANA
Atchutuni Saibaba – Appellant
Versus
State Represented by the Inspector of Police – Respondent


( 1 ) (CRIMINAL Appeal under section 374 (2) Crl. P. C. against the order in SC. No. 155 of 1993 on the file of the Court of the Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Vijayawada.) a1 to A3 in Sessions Case No. 155 of 1993 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Vijayawada, are the appellants. As against A4 an order of acquittal was recorded and it had attained finality. However, A1 to A3 were convicted by the learned Judge vide judgment dated 2. 9. 1998 under Sections 498-A and 306 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and they were sentenced as follows:- (i) A1 and A3 were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year each; A2 was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months and in addition to it, A1 to A3 were imposed a fine of Rs. 2,000/-each, in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of three months each, for the offence under Section 498-A IPC. (ii) A1 and A3 were also sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and A2 to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year and in addition to it. A1 to A3 were imposed a fine of Rs. 5000/- each, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period o















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top