SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 1310

D.S.R.VERMA
Khasim Saheb – Appellant
Versus
S. Hanumanthu – Respondent


D. S. R. VARMA, J.

( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision Petition, by the plaintiff, is directed against the order, dated 20-10-2003, passed by the Junior Civil judge, Pattikonda, Kurnool District, in C. F. R. No. 2428 of 2003, in an un-numbered original suit, insisting for payment of stamp duty and penalty on the suit document, which is an agreement of sale, for registering the plaint, at the time of registration of the plaint as a suit.

( 2 ) THE facts, as could be seen from the impugned order, are that the petitioner herein had instituted the suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale against the respondent herein on the basis of an agreement of sale dated 17-6-1992. Office of the Court below took an objection as to the maintainability of the suit stating that the suit document i. e. , agreement of sale dated 17-6-1992, is a sale deed in the eye of law and not an agreement of sale simpliciter inasmuch as the recitals in the agreement of sale show that the property was delivered to the petitioner/plaintiff along with the agreement and hence the suit cannot be numbered unless the required stamp duty and penalty on the said basic document is paid.

( 3 ) THE Court below heard the lear
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top