SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 5

P.S.NARAYANA
Midicharla Ramanamma – Appellant
Versus
V. Naga Prathap – Respondent


P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) THE appellants had preferred the present civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the order passed in W. C. No. 89 of 1998 dated 27-3-2002 on the file of the Commissioner for workmen s Compensation, Kurnool aggrieved by the facts that the interest of 12% per annum was not awarded from the date of accident till the date of realization even though the amount was deposited in 30 days. The factual aspects need not be gone into elaborately since the facts are not in dispute and the operative portion of the order in W. C. No. 89 of 1998 reads as follows:"the opposite parties 1 and 2 are directed to deposit the total amount of rs. 2,13,570/- (Two lakhs thirteen thousand and five hundred and seventy rupees only) by way of demand draft drawn on State Bank of india, Kurnool in favour of the commissioner for Workmen s compensation, Kurnool within thirty days from the date of receipt of this order. If they fail to deposit the awarded amount within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order, they have to pay an interest at the rate 6% P. A. from the date of order to the date of realization, in addition to the penalty that may be imposed under Sec. 4-A (3) of the Workmen s











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top