SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 6

P.S.NARAYANA
Kudiyala Ramana – Appellant
Versus
Vattikolla somaraju – Respondent


P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) THE revision petitioner filed the civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure questioning the order of the Junior Civil Judge. Prathipadu in E. A. S. R. No. 3014 of 2001 in e. P. No. 45 of 1998 in O. S. No. 44 of 1995 dated 20-11-2001.

( 2 ) THE facts in brief are as follows.

( 3 ) THE revision petitioner is the auction purchaser. The petitioner participated in the above E. P. sale proceedings and became the highest bidder and the sale was knocked down for Rs. 67,000. 00 in his favour on 31-7-2001. The petitioner paid an amount of rs. 16,750/- on 31-7-2001 i. e. , 1/4th amount of Rs. 67,000. 00. It is further stated that the petitioner applied for challan for the deposit of the remaining sale consideration and for the General stamps (i. e.) N. J. Stamps and it was also stated that a specific mention was made in this regard in the application. But, however, the challan was not issued for General stamps. The petitioner also stated that he applied for challan in time and also submitted lodgment schedule. There was neither default not negligence on his part due to the reasons stated supra and the petitioner was unable to comply with









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top