SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 310

DALAVA SUBRAHMANYAM
Neelam Venkata Kami Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


DALAVA SUBRAHMANYAM, J.

( 1 ) THE revision petitioner-A1 filed the revision against the judgment of conviction and sentence in C. C. No. 365 of 1997 on the file of the Addl. Judicial magistrate of First Class, Kadiri dated 14. 8. 2000 in convicting the revision petitioner-Al for an offence under section 417 IPC and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months which was confirmed in Crl. Appea1 no. 234 of 2000 on the file of the Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Hindupur.

( 2 ) THE brief facts leading to the filing of the revision are as follows: about two years prior to the filing of the charge sheet A1, A3 and A4 came to the house of Sara1amma, the de facto complainant, for marriage A1liance. Since then sara1amma developed love with A1 who promised her that he would marry. A1 developed closeness with the victim sara1amma and used to visit her house frequently and the parents of the victim a1lowed A1 to move freely with the victim as they were under the impression that A1 would marry their daughter. A1 promised the victim that he would marry her and requested for sexua1 intercourse with dishonest intention. The victim accepted and A1lowed A1 to have sex









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top