DALAVA SUBRAHMANYAM
Neelam Venkata Kami Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) THE revision petitioner-A1 filed the revision against the judgment of conviction and sentence in C. C. No. 365 of 1997 on the file of the Addl. Judicial magistrate of First Class, Kadiri dated 14. 8. 2000 in convicting the revision petitioner-Al for an offence under section 417 IPC and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months which was confirmed in Crl. Appea1 no. 234 of 2000 on the file of the Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Hindupur.
( 2 ) THE brief facts leading to the filing of the revision are as follows: about two years prior to the filing of the charge sheet A1, A3 and A4 came to the house of Sara1amma, the de facto complainant, for marriage A1liance. Since then sara1amma developed love with A1 who promised her that he would marry. A1 developed closeness with the victim sara1amma and used to visit her house frequently and the parents of the victim a1lowed A1 to move freely with the victim as they were under the impression that A1 would marry their daughter. A1 promised the victim that he would marry her and requested for sexua1 intercourse with dishonest intention. The victim accepted and A1lowed A1 to have sex
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.