SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 316

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
Sachivada Simhachalam – Appellant
Versus
Kalla Naidu – Respondent


B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision Petition is filed by the tenants under Section 22 of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 (for short the Act ) aggrieved by the judgment dated 4-3-2002 made in R. C. A. No. 42 of 1996 by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge-cum-Rent Control Appellate Authority, Visakhapatnam. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein shall be referred to as arrayed in R. C. C. No. 101 of 1995 on the file of the learned Rent Controller, Visakhapatnam.

( 2 ) THE deceased first petitioner filed the said RCC under Sections 10 (1) (2) (i), 3 (b) of the Act against the respondents (petitioners herein) contending that he is the owner of the thatched house consisting of four rooms bearing Door No. 58-6-8, covered by Survey No. 150/1 admeasuring an extent of Ac. 0-52 cents and other adjacent properties admeasuring about Sc. 7-00. It is not necessary in detail to notice the origin of the right, title and interest of the deceased first petitioner. Shorn of all the details - it is the case set up by the deceased first petitioner that the respondents took the schedule property on monthly rent of Rs. 80/- and accordin











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top