B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, P.RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU
Land Acquisition Officer, Tenali – Appellant
Versus
Kanneganti Suseela – Respondent
( 1 ) THE appellant is the Land Acquisition Officer who questions the order of the Civil Court made on reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act in O. P. No. 193 of 1984 dated 9-10-1987, whereunder the Civil Court enhanced the compensation from Rs. 18,000. 00to Rs. 65,000. 00 per acre.
( 2 ) AN extent of Ac. 2-14 cents in Survey Nos. 235/2 and 238 situated within the Municipal limits of Tenali Town belonging to the respondent was acquired for purpose of burial ground in pursuance of a notification published under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act on 19-10-1978. The Land Acquisition Officer by his award dated 27-11-1983 fixed the compensation at Rs. 18,000. 00 per acre. Dissatisfied with the same, the respondent sought for reference before the Civil Court, which on consideration of the evidence on record, enhanced the same to Rs. 65,000. 00per acre.
( 3 ) THE claimant did not examine anybody, except herself as PW1. Of course, she filed Ex. A1 registration extract of sale deed dated 8-3-1977 to show that an extent of 484 Sq. yards in Survey No. 246/1 was sold for a sum of Rs. 7,260. 00, thereby the respondent attempted to establish her cl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.