SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 27

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, P.RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU
Land Acquisition Officer, Tenali – Appellant
Versus
Kanneganti Suseela – Respondent


P. RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant is the Land Acquisition Officer who questions the order of the Civil Court made on reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act in O. P. No. 193 of 1984 dated 9-10-1987, whereunder the Civil Court enhanced the compensation from Rs. 18,000. 00to Rs. 65,000. 00 per acre.

( 2 ) AN extent of Ac. 2-14 cents in Survey Nos. 235/2 and 238 situated within the Municipal limits of Tenali Town belonging to the respondent was acquired for purpose of burial ground in pursuance of a notification published under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act on 19-10-1978. The Land Acquisition Officer by his award dated 27-11-1983 fixed the compensation at Rs. 18,000. 00 per acre. Dissatisfied with the same, the respondent sought for reference before the Civil Court, which on consideration of the evidence on record, enhanced the same to Rs. 65,000. 00per acre.

( 3 ) THE claimant did not examine anybody, except herself as PW1. Of course, she filed Ex. A1 registration extract of sale deed dated 8-3-1977 to show that an extent of 484 Sq. yards in Survey No. 246/1 was sold for a sum of Rs. 7,260. 00, thereby the respondent attempted to establish her cl








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top