GODA RAGHURAM
Raji Reddy – Appellant
Versus
APSRTC – Respondent
( 1 ) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioners; Mr. K. Harinath, learned standing Counsel for the 1st respondent and the learned Government pleader for GAD for the 2nd respondent. The learned Additional Advocate-General mr. D. Prakash Reddy assisted the Court at request.
( 2 ) THE petitioners, in substance, seek a declaration that the action of the respondents in not following the procedure while initiating recruitment to the posts of conductors, Drivers and Shramiks (Cleaners); and not following the Presidential Order, 1974 (for short order, 1974 ) or considering the rule of Reservation therein as between the locals and non-locals is illegal and arbitrary; and for a declaration that the notification of the respondent-Corporation dated 5-10-1999 published in the daily press is illegal and arbitrary.
( 3 ) THE petitioners are unemployed persons belonging to Nalgonda district, temporarily residing at Hyderabad. The 1st respondent-Corporation issued a notification dated 5-10-1999 inviting applications for filling up the anticipated posts of Drivers and Conductors, both in Hyderabad city region and Ranga Reddy region and for shramiks (Cleaners) in Hyderabad city region o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.