SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 531

GODA RAGHURAM
Raji Reddy – Appellant
Versus
APSRTC – Respondent


M. V. RAJA RAM, J.

( 1 ) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioners; Mr. K. Harinath, learned standing Counsel for the 1st respondent and the learned Government pleader for GAD for the 2nd respondent. The learned Additional Advocate-General mr. D. Prakash Reddy assisted the Court at request.

( 2 ) THE petitioners, in substance, seek a declaration that the action of the respondents in not following the procedure while initiating recruitment to the posts of conductors, Drivers and Shramiks (Cleaners); and not following the Presidential Order, 1974 (for short order, 1974 ) or considering the rule of Reservation therein as between the locals and non-locals is illegal and arbitrary; and for a declaration that the notification of the respondent-Corporation dated 5-10-1999 published in the daily press is illegal and arbitrary.

( 3 ) THE petitioners are unemployed persons belonging to Nalgonda district, temporarily residing at Hyderabad. The 1st respondent-Corporation issued a notification dated 5-10-1999 inviting applications for filling up the anticipated posts of Drivers and Conductors, both in Hyderabad city region and Ranga Reddy region and for shramiks (Cleaners) in Hyderabad city region o

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top