SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M. HIDAYATULLAH, C.J.I., J.C. SHAH, V. RAMASWAMI, G.K. MITTER AND A.N. GROVER, JJ.
A. V. S. Narsimhas Rao and others, Appellants
Versus
The State of A.P. and another, Respondents;
Writ Petn. No. 65 of 1969, D/- 28-3-2969.
Advocates appeared
Mr. S. V. Gupte, Senior Advocate (M/s. P. A. Choudhury and K. Rajendra Chaudhari, Advocates with him), for Petitioner Mr. M. C. Setalvad, Senior Advocate and 423 Mr. P. Ramachandra Rao, Advocate General, for State of Andhra Pradesh (Mr. A. Raghuvir, Government Pleader, Andhra Pradesh High Court and Mr. A. V. Rangam, Advocate with them), for Respondent No. 1: Mr. M. C. Setalvad, Senior Advocate (Mr. R. N. Sachthey, Advocate with him), for Respondent No. 2; M/s. R. V. Pillai, H. S. Gururaj Rao and Subodh Markandeya, Advocates, for Respondents Nos. 3 to 45; M/s. Sardar Ali Khan and P. N. Duda, Advocates and Mr. J. B. Dadachanji, Advocate of M/s. J. B. Dadachanji and Co., for Respondent No. 46; M/s. P. A. Choudhary, K. Rajendra Chaudhari and C. S. Sreenivasa Rao, Advocates, for Interveners.
-held, Parliament has but state legislature has not, power under Article 35 (a) to create residential qualification for employment. Law already in force in the matter on the subject before Constitution, shall remain in force subject to such adaptation as may be made under Article 372.
Judgment
HIDAYATULLAH, C.J.I. :- The petitioners are persons employed in the Ministerial Services of the Andhra Pradesh Government. All of them were working in various offices located in the cities of Hyderabad and Secunderabad. On January 19, 1969, leaders of all political parties in the Legislature of the Andhra Pradesh State appeared to have met and reached a decision that to implement what are called Telangana Safeguards , the following measures should be taken:
"All non-domicile persons, who have been appointed either directly, by promotion or by transfer to posts reserved under the Andhra Pradesh Public Employment (Requirement as to Residence) Rules 1959 for domiciles of Telengana region will be immediately relieved from service. The posts so rendered vacant will be filled by qualified candidates possessing domicile qualifications and in cases where such candidates are not available the posts shall be left unfilled till qualified domicile candidates become available. Action on the above lines will be taken immediately.
All non-domicile employees so relieved shall be employment in the Andhra region without break in service and by creating supernumerary posts, if necessary."
2. The Government of Andhra Pradesh then passed an order [G. O. Ms. 36 G. A. (SR) Dept.] on January 21, 1969 relieving before February 28, 1969 all non-domicile persons appointed on or after November 1, 1956 to certain categories of posts reserved for domiciles of Telengana under the Andhra Pradesh Public Employment (Requirement as to Residence) Rules, 1959. Names of such incumbents were to be shown in a proforma and they were to be employed in the Andhra region without breaking service by creating supernumerary posts, if necessary. These supernumerary posts were to be treated as temporary addition to the strength of the office concerned and were to be adjusted against future vacancies in corresponding posts as they arose. The action was based upon Section 3 of the Public Employment (Requirement as to Residence) Act, 1957 (44 of 1957) which was an Act of Parliament made in pursuance of Clause (3) of Article 16 of the Constitution making special provision for requirement as to residence and brought into force on March 21, 1959. Section 3 of the Act gave the power to make Rules in respect of certain classes of employment in certain areas. It provided:
"3. Power to make rules in respect of certain classes of public employment in certain areas-
(1) The Central Government may by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules prescribing, in regard to appointments to-
(a) any subordinate service or post under the State Government of Andhra Pradesh or
* * * * * *
* * * * * *
any requirement as to residence within the Telangana area or the said Union Territory as the case may be, prior to such appointment.
(2) In this section,-
(a) * * * * * *
* * * * * *
(b) "Telangana area" comprises all the territories specified in sub-section (1) of Section 8 of the States Reorganisation Act 1956."
Under Section 4, the Rules had to be laid before each House of Parliament for a period of not less than 30 days and Parliament could make such alterations as it liked. Under Section 5 of the Rules had a life of 5 years but by subsequent legislation the period was extended to 10 years. It is said that the period is to be extended by another 5 years. The Rules were made on March 21, 1959. They are called the Andhra Pradesh Public Employment (Requirement as to Residence) Rules, 1959. Rule 3 provides:
"3. Requirement as a residence Prior to Appointment:
A person shall not be eligible for appointment to a post within the Telengana area under the State Government of Andhra Pradesh or to a post under a local authority (other than a cantonment board) in the said area unless-
(i) he has been continuously residing within the said area for a period of not less than fifteen years immediately preceding the prescribed date; and
(ii) he produces before the appointing authority concerned, if so required by it
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.