SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 564

V.V.S.RAO
Mirza Ramza Ali – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Prohibition and Excise. Hyderabad – Respondent


V. V. S. RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner claims to be Branch Manager of M/s Sri Ram Transport Finance Ltd. ( financier for brevity ). The financier appears to have given a loan to one Ch. Sarda ( hire for brevity) under an agreement dated 5-6-1996 ( hire purchase agreement for brevity) for purchase of a goods vehicle, lorry bearing No. AP-26-T-2039. Under the hire purchase agreement, the hirer has to pay monthly instalments to the financier and it was covenanted that the hirer shall not transport any illegal and unauthorized goods. Clause 8 of the hire purchase agreement provides that ownership of the vehicle will remain with the financier unless and until the loan amount is repaid.

( 2 ) THE vehicle in question was intercepted and checked by the Prohibition and Excise Inspector, Kovur along with his staff on 27-7-1996. The lorry was carrying 360 quarts of Indian made liquor (IML ). Under a panchanama, the vehicle along with the contraband was seized and produced before the second respondent herein. The latter initiated proceedings under S. 13 (2) of the A. P. Prohibition Act, 1995 ( the Prohibition Act ).

( 3 ) THE hirer, claiming herself to be owner, presented an application to t





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top