B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THESE writ petitions may be disposed of by a common order, since they are all interconnected and the questions that require resolution in all of them are substantially the same.

( 2 ) W. P. NOS. 889,1976,2260,2267 of 1998;4156 and 13650 of 2000 are directed against the common judgment dated 31-12-1997 made in L. G. C. Nos. 131 and 136 of 1995 by the Special Court under the Andhra Pradesh land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, hyderabad (for short the Special Court ). W. P. Nos. 3062 and 3120 of 1998 are directed against the judgment dated 31-12-1997 made in L. G. C. No. 110 of 1994 and W. P. No. 6240 of 1995 is directed against the common judgment dated 6-2-1995 made in L. G. C. Nos. 21 and 22 of 1994 by the Special Court.

( 3 ) SUBSTANTIALLY the issues that arise forconsideration are one and the same in all these writ petitions.

( 4 ) THE relevant facts leading to filing ofthese writ petitions may have to be noticed in order to consider as to whether the impugned judgments rendered by the special Court are vitiated for any reason requiring our interference in exercise of certiorari jurisdiction. Whether the judgments under review are vitiated by any error

Click Here to Read the rest of this document