SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 1061

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Vasavi Co-operative Housing Society Limited – Respondent


B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) DEFENDANTS 1 to 4 and 7 in O. S. No. 794 of 1988 on the file of the III Additional Judge, city Civil Court, Hyderabad at secunderabad are the appellants in this appeal. The trial court decreed the said suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff society for the relief of declaration of its title in respect of the green marked portion of the suit land comprising of Ac. 6-30 guntas covered by survey Nos. 60/1 and 61 of Kakaguda village and also for recovery of vacant possession of the same from defendants 1 to 3 and 7 after removal of the structures made therein by them. The trial court also granted the relief of perpetual injunction in favour of the respondent-plaintiff and as against the appellants-defendants 1 to 3 and 7 restraining them from interfering with the enjoyment of Ac. 0-06 guntas of land in the same survey numbers of the same village shown in yellow colour in the suit plan comprising of plot Nos. 72 and 52 of the layout plan situated in Survey No. 61 and plot Nos. 183,139,140 and 141 of the layout plan situated in Survey No. 60/1. Aggrieved by the same, this appeal has been preferred.

( 2 ) FOR the sake of convenience, the parties herein shall be














































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top