SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 662

T.MEENA KUMARI
Bhakthavathsala Sukumar – Appellant
Versus
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Visakhapatnam – Respondent


T. MEENA KUMARI, J.

( 1 ) AGGRIEVED by the orders of the first respondent dated 25. 6. 2002 wherein the petitioner was discharged from the services of the respondents 1 to 3 - corporation on the ground that he secured employment by giving false information that he belongs to Scheduled Caste, the present writ Petition is filed.

( 2 ) THE case of the petitioner, as narrated in the affidavit, is as follows: the petitioner belongs to SC Community and he joined in the organization of respondents 1 to 3 on 5. 1. 1980 as Clerk- cum-Typist under reserved quota meant for scheduled Castes by producing caste certificate with serial No. 2/80-B3 dated 1. 1. 1980 issued by the Mandal Revenue officer, Salur. The respondents 1 to 3 got verified his caste certificate through the district Collector, Visakhapatnam as genuine one and as such he continued in the employment without any interruption till 25. 6. 2002 on which date he was discharged from service. It is also stated that in the year 1989, the respondents 1 to 3 sought clarification about his caste with the District Collector, vizianagaram when the case of the petitioner has come up for consideration to select him to the management cadre. The




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top