SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 909

D.S.R.VERMA
Thippareddy Obulamma – Appellant
Versus
Balu Narasimhulu – Respondent


D. S. R. VARMA, J.

( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order and decree, dated 20-02-2002, passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Darsi, dismissing the application in I. A. No. 55 of 2002 in O. S. No. 16 of 2001, filed under Section-151 of the Code of Civil Procedure to permit the petitioners to mark the documents, dated 29-07-1983 and 21-05-1986 as exhibits for collateral purpose to prove the nature of their possession under the said documents after collecting necessary stamp duty and penalty, if any, on those documents.

( 2 ) THE petitioners are the defendants and the respondents are the plaintiffs. The suit is filed for declaration of title and permanent injunction. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as arrayed in the suit.

( 3 ) THE whole dispute is between the wife of the illatom son-in-law and two brothers who are the grand children of one late Pitchi Reddy. It appears that late Pitchi Reddy agreed to give the alleged illatom son-in-law by name Venkataswamy a share in the joint family properties along with his sons. In that process, some partition was also effected, of course, there is a dispute as regards the shares, which has snow

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top