Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, P.S.NARAYANA
EState Officer and Manager (Recoveries), A.P.Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Recovery Officer, debts Recovery Tribunal, Bangalore - Respondent
Decided On : 08-06-03
Andhra Pradesh Public premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1968 – Section 4 (1) – Sake of convenience – Arises for consideration – Inter-related and interconnected – Contempt Case – Appellant – Court shall refer to the parties by their names APHC and Syndicate Bank instead of referring to them as petitioners and respondents – Court shall refer to the United Auto Tractors limited, who is the allottee of the land and principal borrower as the company – APHC filed challenging the proclamation of sale of Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Bangalore and auction sale notice proposing to auction plot which forms part and parcel of plot measuring situated various grounds –Held, Company has admitted that it was in the red and could not establish any industrial unit for the purpose of manufacture of agricultural tractors for which purpose the land has been allotted to it; (f) that the order passed by the Recovery Officer rejecting the claim petition of APHC is vitiated – Recovery officer could not have proceeded with the sale of the land belonging to the APHC in the absence of any specific authorisation and permission by the Presiding Officer of DRT – In the schedule of the recovery certificate – No mention of the details of the lands in question enabling the Recovery Officer to proceed against the same for recovery and realisation of the decreetal amount and (g) that the sale notifications issued by the APHC do not suffer from any legal infirmities – Oral application is accordingly dismissed.
( 1 ) THIS batch of writ petitions and Contempt Case may be disposed of by a common order since the subject-matter that arises for consideration in all of them is one and the same and they are inter-related and interconnected. The parties in all the cases, except in W. P. No. 24115 of 1998, are also one and the same.
( 2 ) W. P. Nos. 14174, 24502 and 36133 of 1998 are filed by the Andhra pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited (APHC) whereas W. P. Nos. 25060 of 1998 and 17443 of 1999 are filed by the Syndicate Bank.
( 3 ) FOR the sake of convenience, we shall refer to the parties by their names i. e. APHC and Syndicate Bank instead of referring to them as petitioners and respondents. We shall refer to the M/s. United Auto Tractors limited, who is the allottee of the land and principal borrower as the company .
( 4 ) THE APHC filed W. P. No. 14174 of 1998 challenging the proclamation of sale dated 21 -1 -1998 of Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Bangalore and auction sale notice dated 8-3-1998 proposing to auction plot No. A-27/2 to an extent of ac. 25. 00 which forms part and parcel of plot no. A-27 measuring Ac. 51. 00 situated at ida, Nacharam, Ranga Reddy District, hyderabad on various grounds.
( 5 ) LIKEWISE, W. P. No. 24502 of 1998 is filed by the APHC challenging the orders dated 12-8-1998 passed by the Recovery officer, DRT rejecting the claim of the APHC in respect of the property in Plot No. A-27 and the consequential decision to sell the same in public auction in pursuance of the certificate dated 30-12-1996 issued by the drt, Bangalore.
( 6 ) W. P. No. 36133 of 1998 is also filed by the APHC challenging the action of the same recovery Officer in proposing to auction the land admeasuring Ac. 51. 00 in two lots in realisation of the amounts due from the company.
( 7 ) THE Syndicate Bank filed W. P. No. 24060 of 1998 challenging the auction-cum-sale of the property out of plot No. A-27 situated at IDA, Nacharam pursuant to the auction notice dated 6-8-1998. W. P. No. 17443 of 1999 is also filed by the Syndicate Bank questioning the cancellation of allotment order dated 14-7-1999 to an extent of Ac. 26. 00 of land earlier allotted to the company. Factual Matrix :
( 8 ) THE Company submitted its application dated 19/03/1969 seeking allotment of an extent of Ac. 100. 00 of land in the industrial area for setting up of an industry to manufacture agricultural tractors and implements. The Government of Andhra pradesh vide letter dated 18-7-1972 of the director of Industries allotted an extent of ac. 51. 00 of land in Nacharam Industrial development area in favour of the company for setting up of the said industry. That accordingly an agreement was entered into on 3-8-1972 by and between the Government of Andhra Pradesh and the company, which inter alia required the company to pay to the Government the cost of the land plus developmental charges as determined by the government. That as a condition precedent, to place the company in possession of the plot allotted, an initial payment of not less than Rs. 2,46,840. 00 being 50% of the costs was required to be paid. That the Company agreed to execute a promissory note in favour of the Government for the balance unpaid cost of the land plus developmental charges on the basis of the cost tentatively arrived at Rs. 9,680. 00 per acre. The Company had undertaken and agreed to pay the amount under the said promissory note within a period of six months from the date of execution of the agreement i. e. 3-8-1972. The date and time of payment has been agreed to be the essence of the contract. It is unnecessary to refer to the details of various terms and conditions incorporated into the agreement except those which are relevant for the purpose of disposal of these writ petitions.
( 9 ) SINCE the controversy between the parties is required to be resolved mainly with reference to the certain covenants incorporated in the agreement, we sha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.