SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 1213

P.S.NARAYANA, B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
Government Of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
Pushpendar Kaur – Respondent


B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) A distinguished member of the legal fraternity invoked the extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in W. P. No. 18610 of 2002 challenging the legality of the action taken by the Government of Andhra Pradesh in terminating her engagement as Government Pleader, andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal vide the impugned G. O. Rt. No. 1294, dated 21-8-2002. The whole grievance of the writ petitioner centers around her alleged illegal termination of the engagement as Government pleader, Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal.

( 2 ) A learned single Judge of this Court allowed the said writ petition filed by the writ petitioner and accordingly set aside the impugned G. O. Rt. No. 1294, dated 21-8-2002. Hence this writ appeal by the State of Andhra pradesh challenging the correctness of the said order passed by the learned single judge.

( 3 ) IN order to appreciate the question as to whether the termination of the professional engagement of the writ petitioner as Government Pleader, Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal suffers from any infirmities, it becomes just and necessary to notice the legal environment rel













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top