SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 283

BILAL NAZKI
G. SHRAVAN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


BILAL NAZKI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner were arrested on 7-7-2000 by the Inspector of police, East Zone, Task Force at Central bus Station. Gowliguda. A case at Afzulgunj police station being Cr. No. 347 of 2000 was registered under Section 411, IPC, and section 25 of Antiques and Treasurers act, 1970. After their arrest the petitioners moved bail application before the iv Metropolitan Magistrate contending that same offence for the same occurrence had been registered at Peddakothapally Police station, Mahaboobnagar district being cr. No. 61 of 1997 and in that case the magistrate, Kollapur had already granted them bail therefore they could not be kept in custody for the offence for which they had already been bailed out by a competent magistrate. In spite of this plea their bail application was rejected. They moved the I Additional Metropolitan Sessions judge, Hyderabad. He was also informed that the accused had been bailed out by a competent Court, but he also rejected the bail application with the following observations :"if the case has been registered against the petitioner/accused and others for the same offence in Cr. No. 61 of 1997 of P. S. Peddakothapally and if the SHO, Afzal



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top