Back
IYYAPU PANDURANGA RAO, RAMANUJULU NAIDU
M. A. Dharman, sou of Appukuttan 68, solayappa Naichen Street, Madras-17 – Appellant
Versus
State OF A. P. by Secretary to Government, General Administration department, Hyderabad – Respondent
( 1 ) IN this batch of Writ Petitions filed for issue of writs of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents !o produce before this Court, respectively, (1) anwar Ismail, s/o Ismail, (2) Dawood Mohammed, s/o Siddiqui, (3) dawcod, s/o Yusuf, (4) Ishaq, s/o Omar, (5) Baktar Ahmad Mujawar Khan, s/o Mujawar Khan, (6) Kasim Mohammed s/o Shaik Mohammed, (7) abdullah Usman, s/o Usman, (8) Mossa, s/o Ibrahim, and (9) Rafi, s/o abdullah, presently undergoing detention as remanded prisoners in the central Prison, Visakhapatnam, hereinafter referred to, for the sake of convenience, as the detenus and to set them at liberty, an important question of law as to the interpretation of Sec. 167 (2) (b) of the Code of criminal Procedure and the consequences that flow from contravention of or non-compliance with, the provisions of the said section arises for consideration.
( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to the filing of the batch of writ petitions lie in a narrow compass and may briefly be stated. All the detenus are Helpers and Sailors employed in an Arab Dhow. It sailed towards the coastal sea in the State of Andhra Pradesh and it was intercepted at the coast near narsapur by the
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
