SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 176

DUBAGUNTA SUBRAHMANYAM
VEMURI SIVA VENKATA KOTESWARA RAO – Appellant
Versus
JASTI BALA RAMA KRISHNA – Respondent


DUBAGUNTA SUBRAHMANYAM, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is filed against the order dated 25th September, 2000, in LA. No. 459 of 1998 in O. S. No. 162 of 1998 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Avanigadda.

( 2 ) IN I. A. No. 399 of 1998 the trial court appointed under the provisions of order XXVI Rule 9 C. P. C. , a commissioner to note the physical features of the suit lands and a Bode said to be in existence in the suit lands. Commissioner inspected the suit property. She filed her report dated 10-8-1998 in the court. The said appointment of commissioner was made on a petition filed by the plaintiff. After the commissioner filed her report, the defendants, who are the respondents in this revision petition, filed second application in I. A. No. 459 of 1998 to appoint a commissioner to note the physical features and also to note the existence of other source of irrigation to the plaintiff, etc. The trial Court appointed a second commissioner overruling the objections made by the plaintiff. Aggrieved by that order dated 25th September, 2000, the plaintiff filed this revision petition.

( 3 ) AT the time of appointing the second commissioner, the trial Court observed that the first com






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top