SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 579

ELIPE DHARMA RAO
MURALIKONDA – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


ELIPE DHARMA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE sole accused-appellant herein, preferred this Criminalappeal aggrieved of the conviction for the offence under Sections 7 and 13 (1) (d) (i) read with Section 13 (2) of the Prevention of corruption Act, 1988 ( for brevity the Act ) and sentence to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months and imposition of fine of rs. 500/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for three months for the former offence and to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for six months for the latter offence passed in CC No. 37 of 1992 on 12-7-1996 by the learned Principal special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases, hyderabad.

( 2 ) THE gravamen of the charge, in narrow compass, is that on 30-1-1991 the father of the complainant, Thakur Jogender singh, approached the appellant who was incharge Executive Engineer, Sathnala medium Irrigation Project, Adilabad District, with an application for issue of registered contract proceedings, as his father T. Ramchander Singh intended to take the irrigation contract, but the accused informed him that the proceedings will be issued in the month of June since the ap























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top