G.YETHIRAJULU
Maheswaran Laxmi – Appellant
Versus
Maheswaram Krishna Murty – Respondent
( 2 ) THE appellant is the plaintiff and the respondent herein is the defendant in the suit. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died and his L. Rs. were brought on record as appellants 2 to 4. During the pendency of the appeal, the 2nd appellant also died. Therefore, his L. Rs. were also brought on record as appellants 5 to 9.
( 3 ) THE plaintiff filed the present suit for declaration that the judgment and decree in o. S. No. 266 of 1987 dated 29-7-1987 on the file of the District Munsif, Siddipet is obtained by playing fraud by the defendant and alternatively for cancellation of the said decree.
( 4 ) THE averments of the plaint are briefly as follows: the plaintiff s husband late maheswaram Lakshminarsaiah "was the paternal uncle of the defendant. The said lakshminarasaiah died intestate on 3-3-1983 issueless at the age of 72 years leaving behind him the plaintiff as the only legal heir. Late Lakshmi Narasiah owned and possessed a hou
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.