SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 785

DALAVA SUBRAHMANYAM
B. Purnima Anantha Lakshml – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


DALAVA SUBRAHMANYAM, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant-plaintiff filed the second appeal against the decree and judgment in a. S. No. 91 of 1998 dated 25-7-1989 on the file of the District Court at Visakhapatnam in confirming the decree and Judgment in o. S. No. 662 of 1982 dated 28-12-1987 on the file of the IV Additional District Munsif at visakhapatnam in dismissing the suit filed for declaration that the plaintiff belongs to kondareddy caste of Dummugudem village in Khammam District and for consequential relief.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case are asfollows, the plaintiff contended that she belongs to a family of Kondareddy caste, which is classified as Scheduled Tribe, and that her father is Rambabu Reddy, whose parents are narayana Reddy and Appalanarasamma, who lived at Dummugudem. All the family members of the plaintiff were recognized and treated as Kondareddy community since several decades. The plaintiff studied matriculation in the year 1979, Intermediate and B. Sc. first year in St. Joseph College at waltair and the school records would show that she belongs to Scheduled Tribe. While so, the plaintiff appeared for entrance examination of M. B. B. S and oral interview was conduct














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top