SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 1179

P.S.NARAYANA
D. Suxyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
I. Suryakanthamma – Respondent


P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) THE 10th defendant in O. S. No. 77/80 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Bhimavaram had filed A. S. No. 1910/87. The 8th defendant in the said suit likewise preferred a. S. No. 2802/87 and since both these appeals arise out of the same Judgment, both the Appeals are being disposed of by this Common Judgment.

( 2 ) THE 1st respondent in these Appeals - plaintiff in the suit, filed O. S. No. 77/80 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Bhimavaram for partition of the plaint schedule properties into two equal shares and the averments in the plaint are as follows.

( 3 ) 1st defendant is the sister of the plaintiff. The property shown in the schedule measuring Ac. 1-54 cents and other lands originally belonged to Basula Peraiah. These properties were got by him in the family partition which was effected on 25-2-1959. The said Peraiah executed a Will dated 18-9-1963 in a sound and disposing state of mind. As per the terms of the said will, the schedule properties are to be enjoyed by Smt. Balsu Seshamma - his wife, and Venkatramayya - his son, during their lifetime with life estate and thereafter the said properties are to be devolved on the plaintiff and the 1st defend
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top